Welcome to Finance World

May 30, 2010

American Red Cross chapters merge

Filed under: news — Tags: , , — DoctorBusiness @ 1:09 am

The Sacramento chapter of the American Red Cross is merging with two others in Northern California so the nonprofit groups can be more efficient with donor dollars.

The Sacramento Sierra, San Joaquin and Stanislaus chapters will merge July 1 to collectively serve 11 counties, the Red Cross announced Thursday.

The one larger chapter will serve Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, El Dorado, East Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tuolumne counties plus eastern Yolo County.

The consolidation will create a stronger Red Cross presence throughout the 11 counties as the operation becomes more efficient, a news release said. All six offices — in Auburn, Modesto, Sacramento, Sonora, Stockton and Tracy — will remain open.

“This is an exciting time as we explore new opportunities to make our communities safer and better prepared for life threatening emergencies,” Dawn Lindblom, regional chief executive officer, said in the release.

Source

May 27, 2010

Congress raises curtain on tax and spending bill

Filed under: news — Tags: , , — DoctorBusiness @ 11:06 am

Congress on Thursday previewed a grab-bag bill of spending and tax measures that is likely to be a flash point in the debate over the federal debt.

The legislation would extend a host of tax breaks, give continued relief to the unemployed, delay cuts to doctors’ Medicare reimbursements, provide support for job growth and fund disaster relief, among other things.

Congress’ budget scorekeepers haven’t finished estimating the total cost of the bill. But the amount of money that would be raised through pay-for measures is not likely to cover even half of the total cost, which could top $150 billion.

The tax provisions, including those designed to raise tax dollars and those that would reduce them, would only net $10.3 billion in extra revenue, according to preliminary estimates from the Joint Committee on Taxation.

The bill, a melded version of proposal passed earlier by the House and Senate, won’t be free of opposition on either side of the aisle. There is pressure to pay for more of the bill’s provisions, and there is strong disagreement over some of the pay-fors that are included.

Fiscally conservative House Democrats, known as the Blue Dogs, have said they don’t want to go out on a limb for the bill if there aren’t 60 votes in the Senate yet. That raises the possibility that the Senate would amend the bill to secure 60 votes, and it would send back a smaller package to the House for reconsideration.

Safety net: The bill offers a number of safety-net provisions for the unemployed and financially strapped. It would extend to the end of this year a program that provides a greater-than-normal number of weeks that an unemployed person may collect federal unemployment benefits.

In addition, the bill would extend through year-end the federal subsidy to help the newly unemployed pay for health insurance under COBRA. And it also would provide more federal aid to help budget-strapped states meet the increased demands for Medicaid services.

Lastly, it would extend through September 2011 emergency funding to states for food stamps and aid for needy families and a subsidized jobs program.

Tax breaks: The bill would extend a series of lapsed tax breaks for businesses and individuals. Such "tax extenders" include the research and development credit for businesses and the choice for individuals to deduct either their state and local income tax or their state and local sales tax.

In recent years it has been typical to pass such extenders annually so constituents don’t perceive lawmakers as increasing their taxes, said Clint Stretch, managing principal of tax policy at Deloitte Tax LLC.

But extending tax breaks one year at a time masks the real cost of what is in essence a long-term or permanent extension, since the price tag is only recorded in 12-month increments cash advance companies.

Small business: The bill contains a small but significant measure that would extend small business lending incentives that otherwise would expire this month.

The program both eliminates fees that the Small Business Administration normally charges for loans made through the agency, and increases the government guarantees on those loans. The provision has bipartisan support and has helped small firms borrow more than $7 billion this year alone in an otherwise grim lending climate.

Medicare payments: The bill contains a contentious measure that would extend the current Medicare reimbursement rate structure for physicians for three and a half years. Otherwise, Medicare reimbursement rates would automatically be cut 21% starting June 1 and by 1% to 6% in future years because of a pre-set formula that dictates Medicare outlays related reimbursements.

Originally the aim was for the "doc fix" to override the cuts for five years, but there has been pushback about the cost of doing so for that long.

Paying the tab

Among the bill’s "pay-fors" is a change in the way income paid to hedge fund managers and other managers of investment partnerships are taxed. Currently that income — so-called "carried interest" — is taxed at the capital gains rate, which is less than half the top ordinary income tax rate. The bill would instead tax as ordinary income the majority of carried interest that does not reflect returns on invested capital.

House and Senate Democrats differ about just how broadly the carried interest change should be applied. Senate Democrats, for instance, are pushing to exempt venture capital firms, according to Tax Analysts.

Other pay-fors include more than $14 billion worth of changes to corporations’ foreign tax credits.

It’s not clear yet whether the bill will still be subject to further amendment. But the current plan is for the House to bring the bill to the floor for a vote on Tuesday, according to a spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. If it passes, the bill would then be sent to the Senate for a final vote.

The Senate vote could occur before the Memorial Day recess. But there are still other matters that the Senate wants to wrap up before the break, most notably, financial reform and a supplemental spending bill that would, among other things, provide additional funding for U.S. military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

- CNNMoney’s Stacy Cowley and CNN’s Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report. 

Source

May 22, 2010

Euro extends gains on dollar

Filed under: online — Tags: , — DoctorBusiness @ 2:54 pm

The euro pared back earlier losses against the dollar Wednesday, after Germany said it would ban short selling on some European bank shares and the zone’s government bonds.

What prices are doing: The euro rose 1.42% on the dollar to $1.2385 Wednesday, after the European currency touched a new four-year low versus the dollar the day before.

The dollar fell 0.52% versus the British pound to $1.4412. It was down 0.9% against the Japanese yen at ¥91.52.

The dollar is up 8% against the euro over the month, as the shared currency has taken a hit on debt concerns.

What’s moving the market: Late Tuesday, Germany’s financial regulator announced a ban on so-called naked short sales of debt securities issued by euro zone countries as well as the country’s ten leading financial companies.

The restrictions will apply until March 31, 2011. The announcement initially drove the euro down against the dollar, but the euro gained later after investors realized European leaders are serious about stabilizing the currency, said Boris Schlossberg, director of currency research at GFT Forex.

"By taking the speculative shorts out of the market, they’ve naturally lowered the cost of credit in the market right now," Schlossberg said. "That has calmed the markets down."

In short selling, traders bet the value of an investment will fall. Traditional short sellers borrow the security with the aim of selling it, and then they buy it back at a lower price hoping to pocket the difference.

In a "naked" short sale, however, investors short the investment without actually borrowing the shares or bonds. That makes it easier to drive down the asset’s value. 

Source

May 17, 2010

Proposed spill penalty: A year of profits

Filed under: legal — Tags: , , — DoctorBusiness @ 4:18 pm

Companies responsible for oil spills could be forced to give up a year’s worth of profits under a bill introduced in the Senate on Thursday.

The Oil Spill Response and Assistance Act was proposed in response to BP’s Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The bill would double the current $75 million cap on economic damages to $150 million or expose a company to damages equal to the last four quarters of its profits, whichever is greater. (See correction below.)

"Making a company at fault pay their last four quarters of profits is a much more effective way to ensure that energy companies actually pay for their mistakes without chasing many of them out of business," said Sen. David Vitter, R-La., who introduced the bill with Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.

For BP, the new law would result in a $20 billion liability cap, equal to its last four quarters of profits, according to Vitter’s office. Costs to clean up an oil spill are not capped.

The proposal to raise the liability limit is the latest effort in Congress to crack down on companies found to be responsible for oil spills.

"As it stands, the cap on damages is too low, which leaves taxpayers exposed to the risk of paying the steep costs of cleaning up oil spills," said Vitter.

In addition, Vitter and Sessions proposed that oil companies be required to have more containment barriers, or booms, to be used in the event of a spill.

The deepwater oil well owned by BP (BP) is 40 miles off the coast of Louisiana. It is now leaking some 200,000 gallons of crude a day following an explosion April 20 that claimed 11 lives.

The bill would also force all agencies involved with the BP spill to submit "thorough" reports on the incident by Sept. 1.

Earlier, other lawmakers in the House and Senate introduced bills raising the liability cap from $75 million to $10 billion.

Some lawmakers have expressed doubt that Congress can make such changes retroactively. Others, however, point to the Superfund, a major environmental cleanup law passed in the 1980s that forced polluters to reimburse the government for past toxic cleanups.

A bill that would raise the cap to $10 billion, sponsored by Sens. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., was blocked Thursday after the three lawmakers pushed for Senate approval.

But given the public outrage over the spill, and the fact that it’s an election year, there’s a good chance the cap will eventually be raised.

At the same time, some experts warn that an increase in the liability cap could force all oil companies to pay more for insurance to drill offshore.

Correction: An original version of this article mischaracterized the liability cap under the Vitter-Sessions bill. 

Source

May 15, 2010

GenVec receives Nasdaq warning again

Filed under: term — Tags: , , — DoctorBusiness @ 12:09 am

Gaithersburg-based GenVec, whose stock has tumbled this year after pulling the plug on one of its lead cancer treatments, has been notified that its stock price no longer meets Nasdaq Stock Market requirements.

GenVec stock, trading around 62 cents per share, has been below the minimum requirement of $1 per share for more than 30 consecutive business days. The company has until Nov. 8 to regain compliance, which requires trading at $1 per share or more for ten consecutive days.

GenVec shares have lost almost half their value this year.

The notification comes just four months after GenVec regained compliance following a previous warning about its stock price.

The Nasdaq notification does not currently affect GenVec's Nasdaq trading. If it fails to meet compliance by November, the Nasdaq can delist the stock.

"The company intends to actively monitor the bid price for its common stock between now and Nov. 8, 2010, and will consider available options to resolve the deficiency and regain compliance with the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement," GenVec said in a statement, with offering specific plans for boosting its share price.

In March, GenVec decided to shut down its advanced clinical trails for its lead pancreatic cancer drug after it failed to show significant differences from standard care.

The company is focusing on other vaccine research programs that are funded mostly through government grants. It is working on treatments for HIV, foot and mouth disease, influenza and malaria.

GenVec (NASDAQ: GNVC) also has a licensing agreement with Novartis AG for a hearing loss treatment.

Source

May 10, 2010

Continental-United merger will raise airline prices, survey says

Filed under: money — Tags: , , — DoctorBusiness @ 7:24 pm

Forty-two percent of Americans believe the pending $3.2 billion merger between Continental Airlines Inc. and United Airlines will result in higher airline prices, according to a Rasmussen Reports national survey released over the weekend.

The Rasmussen survey of 1,000 U.S. adults, conducted by telephone on May 5 and 6, found that only 6 percent think the joining of the two airlines will bring down prices. Another 21 percent aren't sure what will happen while 31 percent expect prices will remain about the same.

Only 12 percent say the merger, announced May 3, will be a good thing for travelers, while 29 percent are undecided.

Frequent travelers were more likely to say the combination will be bad for travelers.

Rasmussen said the poll's margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points. Field work for Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research LLC.

The merger, if it receives regulatory and shareholder approval, will create the world’s largest airline low fee pay day loans.

The new airline, which will fly under the United name, will carry an estimated 144 million passengers a year to 370 destinations in 59 countries.

When asked in a recent survey what they thought would emerge from the joining of Houston-based Continental (NYSE: CAL) and Chicago-based UAL (NASDAQ: UAUA), 38 percent of 500 Houston Business Journal readers said “a worse airline,” 33 percent said “more unemployment,” 17 percent said they "didn’t know yet" and 10 percent said “a better airline.”

The proposed merger is also not a hit with U.S. Congressman Jim Oberstar, who is asking the government to take a hard look at deal.

Source

May 8, 2010

How can succession planning help save Goldman?

Filed under: technology — Tags: , — DoctorBusiness @ 2:15 pm

The Goldman Sachs hearings on Capitol Hill were painful to watch for many reasons. Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman’s CEO, was questioned closely by Senator Carl Levin concerning Goldman’s duties to clients. Senator Levin’s frustration grew as Mr. Blankfein concentrated his answers on the firm’s responsibilities related to trading and market-making, rather than exhibiting a firm grasp on the distinctions in roles the firm plays with its clients in other areas, such as underwriting and asset management.

A particularly telling moment came when Senator Levin questioned a deposition statement Mr. Blankfein had made in earlier testimony. In that statement, Mr. Blankfein had said he did not realize how important a AAA rating is. Senator Levin found that admission unbelievable. Most anyone selling financial products would recognize the importance of the AAA rating to specific kinds of clients.

Mr. Blankfein’s statement is believable, however, when you recognize the fact that his career was straight-lined through the investment bank’s trading arm, according to Goldman’s own proxy. He had no rotation to other areas and no real exposure in the trenches to the different aspects of the bank’s business.

CFO David Viniar and other Goldman executives exhibited similar lacks of broad-based experience during their testimonies, which begs the question: Can a company operate properly with people at the top who have had narrow career experiences?

The troubles Goldman (GS, Fortune 500) is now experiencing relate very much to this tragic set of circumstances.

Up until now, the company’s board of directors hasn’t seemed to play a very big role in succession planning, which includes assessing the developmental needs of its CEO and senior executives. According to Goldman’s own shareholder proxy this year, the nominating and governance committee of the board "review and concur in the succession plans for our CEO and other members of senior management." This indicates a very passive role — and one that has clearly not served Goldman well.

Whether seeking to make a change at the top — or not — at this critical juncture, the Goldman board needs to step up its involvement and eschew this level of passivity. The board needs to be seriously reviewing its role in succession planning and getting its hands dirty in the details. With continued hits to its reputation, the board must do all it can to ensure that Goldman has and will have the right people in place to move the company forward. This means education and exposure to all aspects of the business.

Goldman’s board needs to get to work immediately to assess its own and senior executives’ training and development needs with respect to the various lines of business and the ethics and compliance associated with each. Once they all have a better understanding, it’s time to explore rotational moves and an organizational restructure so it is easier for staff to sort out ethical dilemmas and for managers to manage them.

–Eleanor Bloxham is CEO of The Value Alliance and Corporate Governance Alliance, a board advisory firm. 

Source

May 2, 2010

Education Realty Trust reports flat first quarter FFO

Filed under: management — Tags: , , — DoctorBusiness @ 7:51 am

Education Realty Trust Inc.’s funds from operations were flat in the first quarter, but income dropped compared to the previous year.

Funds from operations, the accepted performance measure for real estate investment trusts, were $7.815 million in first quarter 2010 compared to $7.795 in first quarter 2009. FFO per share declined, though, from $0.26 in first quarter 2009 to $0.13 in first quarter 2010.

The decline in FFO per share was due to a 28.2 million increase in the average shares outstanding year-over-year.

Income fell to $200,000, or less than $0.01 per share, in the quarter from $400,000, or $0.02 per share, in the year-ago quarter.

Revenues fell slightly in the quarter to $33.1 million from $33.9 million in the year-ago quarter.

Education Realty Trust reiterated its full year 2010 FFO outlook of $0.34-$0.40 per share.

CEO Randy Churchey said the company “made progress” in the quarter executing its restructuring plan and improving operating performance.

“Simultaneously, we continued working toward our longer term goal of strategically repositioning our portfolio through a combination of capital recycling and the acquisition of assets that are more advantageously located,” Churchey said in a statement.

Churchey took the helm of Education Realty Trust on Jan. 1 and has made sweeping changes that have seen executive leadership shifts and increased share prices. Click here to read more about Churchey and the changes he has instituted within the company.

Memphis-based Education Realty Trust (NYSE: EDR) is a REIT that owns, develops and operates 64 student housing communities with 37,835 beds in 22 states.

Source

Powered by WordPress